|
||
|
||
|
Server Time: 8/30/2008 6:34:01 AM PACIFIC |
 Hand analysis...NL, iceman5, 31. Dec 2003 14:47 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Im playing $25 buy in NL. Im in the BB with Q2 of hearts. There are 3 limpers to me and I check. The flop comes K2Q with 1 heart. The pot is about $1. I bet .75 and get called in 2 places. The turn is another Q (K2Q). The pot is $3.25 and I bet $3. The first guy raises another $3. The second guy calls the $6. Now both of them cant have a queen and theres not really any draws ( I guess one could have Ax of hearts but thats alot of hearts out and he shouldnt have called my flop bet with that). The only think that worries me is KQ. I reraise all in (another $17). First guy folds and second guy calls. The river is junk and my full house wins. For some reason I couldnt get the hand history to come up but Im guessing he had AQ. Do you like my play? And would you have called my all in with AQ? | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Hand analysis...NL, KJo, 1. Jan 2004 11:54 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I do like your play, but I also want to say that you were looking for the monster under the bed when you had little need to. It would be easy to put the other player on AQ. If your FH is gonna get beat by a bigger one, then so be it, god bless, that's gonna happen and you're gonna lose all your chips. But it's damn unlikely. Eli on 31. Dec 2003 14:47 iceman5 wrote: > Im playing $25 buy in NL. Im in the BB with Q2 of hearts. There are 3 limpers > to me and I check. The flop comes K2Q with 1 heart. The pot is about $1. I > bet .75 and get called in 2 places. The turn is another Q (K2Q). The pot is > $3.25 and I bet $3. The first guy raises another $3. The second guy calls the > $6. Now both of them cant have a queen and theres not really any draws ( I > guess one could have Ax of hearts but thats alot of hearts out and he shouldnt > have called my flop bet with that). The only think that worries me is KQ. I > reraise all in (another $17). First guy folds and second guy calls. The river > is junk and my full house wins. For some reason I couldnt get the hand history > to come up but Im guessing he had AQ. Do you like my play? And would you have > called my all in with AQ? | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Hand analysis...NL, iceman5, 1. Jan 2004 14:31 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I agree that AQ was more likely which is why I went all in, but I think its healthy to have some fear, as long as you dont let it affect what you know is the right play. You didnt answer my other question. Would you have called my all in bet with AQ? | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Hand analysis...NL, erich schulte, 2. Jan 2004 12:23 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I play the same games... 25 buy ins at party. I don't think your play was wrong, but personally I would have played it a bit slower. There's always the fear of someone with, say QJ catching the J on the river, but I would want to keep the flush draw in. I can also think of reasons for playing it as you did. e.g. maybe a total fish has a flush draw and will call your all in now, but not if he misses on the river. Would I call with AQ? In the party games, yes. Unless I knew you to be a good player and I play too many tables to take much notice of such things. The average player in those games could easilly have any queen and you do have those 3 outs, even if you're beat. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Hand analysis...NL, KJo, 2. Jan 2004 17:11 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I don't know that I would have called, it's possible though. The way you played indicated KQ or Q2, since you bet out big on the flop (unlikely you would have done that with nothing but a queen) and went all in on the turn, after people showed serious strength, indicating that you had more than just a lousy king. The two moves together indicate a FH. I like to think (or hope) I would have laid it down. Eli on 1. Jan 2004 14:31 iceman5 wrote: > I agree that AQ was more likely which is why I went all in, but I think its healthy to > have some fear, as long as you dont let it affect what you know is the right play. You > didnt answer my other question. Would you have called my all in bet with AQ? | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| POKER FORUM HOME | POKER FORUM | LINK TO US | ARCHIVE | ONLINE POKER | Copyright 2002, United Poker Forum |
|
Getting Started |
UPF Tournaments |
Poker News, Views, Rules |
Poker Strategy & Psychology |
Money and Bankroll Poker Bonuses & Promotions | World Series of Poker (WSOP) | Play Online Poker | Poker Odds & Statistics | Tournament Poker | Poker Books, Videos & Learning Tools Looking for a Poker Game | Poker Bad Beats | Not Quite Poker | Quizzes and Polls | Forum Suggestions & Bugs |
|
|
|
|
Interesting Links: Online Poker | Free Poker Games | United Poker Network |
|