![]() |
||
|
|
Server Time: 8/30/2008 9:19:33 AM PACIFIC |
Is a check a bet?, Vince, 30. Dec 2003 06:00 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| My "friendly" poker crowd has recently been debating whether a "check" is considered a bet. The issue is our standard betting rules allow for 3 raises. If a check is considered a "bet", then the next bet after a check that is anything other than a check, is considered the 1st raise, i.e. a bet of $1 after a check bet (a bet of $0?) is a call of the check, plus a $1 raise. I have checked numurous rules sites but find them inconsistent and conflicting. Any help is appreciated. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Is a check a bet?, JLenart, 30. Dec 2003 06:27 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| A check, while an action, is not a bet. If you are playing three raises max after a check (or several) there is still a bet and three raises above that allowed. Hope this clears things up. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Is a check a bet?, shorn, 30. Dec 2003 06:51 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| No. A check should not be considered in the betting/raising order. So, in your game, if the first person checks, then there are still 4 possible "bets" that can occur (bet, then 3 raises). | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Is a check a bet?, Risky Business, 30. Dec 2003 06:54 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Get a new crowd. They're getting a bit anal. on 30. Dec 2003 06:00 Vince wrote: > My "friendly" poker crowd has recently been debating whether a "check" is > considered a bet. The issue is our standard betting rules allow for 3 raises. > If a check is considered a "bet", then the next bet after a check that is > anything other than a check, is considered the 1st raise, i.e. a bet of $1 after > a check bet (a bet of $0?) is a call of the check, plus a $1 raise. I have > checked numurous rules sites but find them inconsistent and conflicting. Any > help is appreciated. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Is a check a bet?, Mark, 30. Dec 2003 11:52 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| If a check = a bet, then after 4 people check, no one can bet on that round. Mark | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Is a check a bet?, Coconut, 30. Dec 2003 13:46 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Yes they could because the second check would be a call, not a raise. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Is a check a bet?, Palinya, 30. Dec 2003 14:01 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| He should have said... if a check = a bet then if 4 people check nobody would be able to raise.. unless you don't count a raise as a bet or if a check = a bet then if 4 people bet what can the next one do? He can't check again since it's a bet and he can't bet since it's a bet. To simplify it for the anal... Nobody can raise again in that round if someone has increased the current required amount to stay in the hand 4 times. Bet, raise, re-raise, re-raise making the bet 4 bets. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| POKER FORUM HOME | POKER FORUM | LINK TO US | ARCHIVE | ONLINE POKER | Copyright 2002, United Poker Forum |
|
Getting Started |
UPF Tournaments |
Poker News, Views, Rules |
Poker Strategy & Psychology |
Money and Bankroll Poker Bonuses & Promotions | World Series of Poker (WSOP) | Play Online Poker | Poker Odds & Statistics | Tournament Poker | Poker Books, Videos & Learning Tools Looking for a Poker Game | Poker Bad Beats | Not Quite Poker | Quizzes and Polls | Forum Suggestions & Bugs |
|
|
|
|
Interesting Links: Online Poker | Free Poker Games | United Poker Network |
|