![]() |
||
|
|
Server Time: 9/5/2008 1:26:57 AM PACIFIC |
Will folding KJo in mid/early position cost me much long run?, Eihli, 3. Sep 2003 21:23 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Or is it the right play on a regular low-limit table, especially one with a lot of raisers? | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Will folding KJo in mid/early position cost me much long run?, chardog, 3. Sep 2003 21:31 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| i wouldn't play it more than 3 or 4 off the button with any frequency unless the table is super loose. just my humble opinion | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Will folding KJo in mid/early position cost me much long run?, dan, 3. Sep 2003 23:37 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I agree with chardog...not exactly a premium hand to hold in a super loose table. I would rather have a table with a few loose players and a few timid ones, just so your good hands don't get bad beat by crap. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Will folding KJo in mid/early position cost me much long run?, shorn, 4. Sep 2003 04:52 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| It won't cost you that much to fold it in EP or MP. KJo is a dangerous hand to play except in LP or a steal position, because it really isn't strong enough to stand a raise from your left and more often than not when their is a raise, you can easily make a second best hand. Now, if the game is loose passive, then it is probably worth a call in MP...I still dump it in the first three spots though. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Will folding KJo in mid/early position cost me much long run?, Snorbolus, 4. Sep 2003 05:42 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| If your opponents are difficult to read and several of them are making it expensive to play post-flop, by raising lots of drawing hands and that sort of thing, then I think that you will probably save money by folding KJo from mid/early positions. You certainly won't be giving up much. If they were a relatively passive bunch who would pay you off when your top pair was good but not punish you much when it wasn't, and especially if their post-flop play helped you to define their hand some, then I think that it would be worth playing from middle and later. Snorbolus on 3. Sep 2003 21:23 Eihli wrote: > Or is it the right play on a regular low-limit table, especially one with a lot > of raisers? | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| POKER FORUM HOME | POKER FORUM | LINK TO US | ARCHIVE | ONLINE POKER | Copyright 2002, United Poker Forum |
|
Getting Started |
UPF Tournaments |
Poker News, Views, Rules |
Poker Strategy & Psychology |
Money and Bankroll Poker Bonuses & Promotions | World Series of Poker (WSOP) | Play Online Poker | Poker Odds & Statistics | Tournament Poker | Poker Books, Videos & Learning Tools Looking for a Poker Game | Poker Bad Beats | Not Quite Poker | Quizzes and Polls | Forum Suggestions & Bugs |
|
|
|
|
Interesting Links: Online Poker | Free Poker Games | United Poker Network |
|