United Poker Forum  

Server Time: 8/29/2008 9:36:50 PM PACIFIC  

Stud/8 premium hands continue, jake-free, 28. Apr 2003 13:07
    View ( Message | Thread )       Return to Thread List
I used a point count method to rank the alwayes playable hands,call them :"Premium Hands"
Low point count: A2=20 ,A3=15, A4=10, A5=5, 23=10, 24=5, 25=5, 34=5, 35=5, 45=5 All other=no poits

High point count: A=4, K=2

Pairs: AA=30, KK=13, QQ=12, JJ=11, TT=10, 99=9, 88=8,77=7, 66=6, 55=5 44=4, 33=3, 22=2.
Straight combination=2,(each combination counts separately)
Flush combination: A=1O, (K down to 2=4 points)
The list below ignors the flush combinations.
AA2 (82 points)
AA3
AAA
AA4
A23 (58 points)
AA5
A24
A25
A34
AA6
AA7
AA8
A35
A45
A26
A27
234
235
A36
A37
245
345 (21points)
A46
888
A47
236
777
A56
A57
246
256
346
356
456
347
357
367
457
467
567
458s
468s
478s
568s
578s
678s (8 points)

comments?

        Return to Thread List
 
 
Re: Stud/8 premium hands continue, stdioh, 28. Apr 2003 13:37
    View ( Message | Thread )       Return to Thread List
I think that it is a pretty good guideline, but certainly not definitive. For starters, I'll take AAA over AA2 15 ways to breakfast in a stud8 game. When you start with rolled up aces, your chances of not getting the big half of the pot are tiny and you have a decent chance of scooping too (generally via no low). With AA2 you have a decent shot at the high and a decent shot at the low, but nothing to write home about. Also, AA2's value is highly dependant on which card is your door in terms of profit that it can yield, as are all the hands listed. I'd take [AA]6 over [A2]A in a stud8 game for sure.

For that matter, rolled up trips of any kind are just far more premium than you show. [KK]K doesn't even appear on your chart and it is a *monster* in a stud8 game - certainly vastly superior to [88]8 which does show up there.

Leaving out the suitedness also makes this table less useful than it could be. A low three straightflush is about as good as you could hope for...certainly much better than AA2, but the disparity between [34]5 suited and [45]3 rainbow is enormous.

As well, with suitedness, having 2 starting cards suited is relatively worthless - maybe worth *something* if one is an ace or king, but I would assign good points for 3 suited cards and almost none for 2 suited cards. Perhaps 10 points for a 3-flush and 1 point for a 2-flush that includes an ace or king. Likewise, 2 cards of a straight means just about nothing, but 3-straights are excellend and a 3-straight with a single gap has value as well.

So all in all, I think that it is a good start, but I think it would require a lot of tweaking to get a good aproximation of true hand values.

Though don't take my criticism too harshly either - I may be off base as stud8 isn't my primary poker interest.
        Return to Thread List
 
 
Re: Stud/8 premium hands continue, TKarrde, 28. Apr 2003 14:40
    View ( Message | Thread )       Return to Thread List
Whoa... I think this why my simple mind has stayed away from "low" games. Throw in the "only two cards" from Omaha and my brain would melt like colby jack on a hot tamale.

TK
        Return to Thread List
 
 
Copyright 2002, United Poker Forum  
Getting Started |  UPF Tournaments |  Poker News, Views, Rules |  Poker Strategy & Psychology |  Money and Bankroll
Poker Bonuses & Promotions |  World Series of Poker (WSOP) |  Play Online Poker |  Poker Odds & Statistics |  Tournament Poker |  Poker Books, Videos & Learning Tools
Looking for a Poker Game |  Poker Bad Beats |  Not Quite Poker |  Quizzes and Polls |  Forum Suggestions & Bugs

Interesting Links: Online Poker | Free Poker Games | United Poker Network