|
||
|
||
|
Server Time: 1/7/2009 5:47:10 AM PACIFIC |
 Roy Cooke's Current Article, chris nelson, 10. Jan 2003 19:06 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I recently read Roy Cooke's new article. This may be a stupid question, but why would hi-lo games be more suited to mathmatically inclined players? I understand the suitability for stud and holdem. I've gravitated toward the omaha8 live games but prefer no limit holdem. The justification is simply that the players tend to payoff a lot more at the lower limits I'm forced to play at because of my lack of bankroll and lack of experience. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roy Cooke's Current Article, Steve Badger, 11. Jan 2003 22:51 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I haven't read Roy's article yet, but HiLo games tend to be more about mathematical certainty. X number of cards make your hand of Y remaining cards. If you don't get one of the X cards you are virtually certain to lose. This is often clearly known. High only games tend to not have anywhere near that certainty. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| POKER FORUM HOME | POKER FORUM | LINK TO US | ARCHIVE | ONLINE POKER | Copyright 2002, United Poker Forum |
|
Getting Started |
UPF Tournaments |
Poker News, Views, Rules |
Poker Strategy & Psychology |
Money and Bankroll Poker Bonuses & Promotions | World Series of Poker (WSOP) | Play Online Poker | Poker Odds & Statistics | Tournament Poker | Poker Books, Videos & Learning Tools Looking for a Poker Game | Poker Bad Beats | Not Quite Poker | Quizzes and Polls | Forum Suggestions & Bugs |
|
|
|
|
Interesting Links: Online Poker | Free Poker Games | United Poker Network |
|