|
||
|
||
|
Server Time: 9/6/2008 4:04:34 PM PACIFIC |
 Roys cardplayer article, jim grass, 23. Aug 2002 13:42 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Roy your article AA is getting quite the debate at 2+2..We have now also got into the debate in our wednesday discussion group...I absolutely know your decision was right and a very basic conclusion based on the wildness of the game etc... What I dont understand is why the response its getting... We met once Roy at the bellagio during the poker meeting and hope someday to see you face to face and discuss how our decisionmaking is going..I`m coming down the week of sept 9-13 and am attending a barbecue the group is putting together and you know your always welcomed .. I think jan and Linda are busy that day sept 11th.. jim | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, Easy E, 23. Aug 2002 19:15 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I don't understand why the decision even took the time that it did. It seemed to me to be fairly automatic that the AA hit the muck... | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, catsclaw, 23. Aug 2002 19:38 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Yes, it is getting a lot of discussion. There has been a lot of debate about overpairs to scaty flops like three straights (with two flush) cards and three to a flush. It is interesting that some of the posters (including Mason) like calling it down with the big pair. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, jim grass, 24. Aug 2002 04:31 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Perhaps the basis of many on this hand to see it through is that since they`re all mostly drunk tired and loose is that no one is considering thier holdings preflop and just gamblin...But still with the three flush all within major draws I would abandon ship against any lineup of 7 players. If anyone doesnt have one of Roys books I suggest STRONGLY that you invest in one of these gems.. They`re absolutely thought provoking articles and yet true to Roys character he throws in some light hearted humor... jim on 23. Aug 2002 19:38 catsclaw wrote: > Yes, it is getting a lot of discussion. There has been a lot of debate about > overpairs to scaty flops like three straights (with two flush) cards > and three to a flush. > > It is interesting that some of the posters (including Mason) like calling > it down with the big pair. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, Roy Cooke, 24. Aug 2002 13:34 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Thanks Jim...If I need an agent I will keep you in mind :-) Roy Cooke on 24. Aug 2002 04:31 jim grass wrote: > Perhaps the basis of many on this hand to see it through is that since they`re all mostly > drunk tired and loose is that no one is considering thier holdings preflop and just > gamblin...But still with the three flush all within major draws I would abandon ship > against any lineup of 7 players. > If anyone doesnt have one of Roys books I suggest STRONGLY that you invest in one of > these gems.. > They`re absolutely thought provoking articles and yet true to Roys character he throws in > some light hearted humor... > > jim > > on 23. Aug 2002 19:38 catsclaw wrote: > > Yes, it is getting a lot of discussion. There has been a lot of debate about > > overpairs to scaty flops like three straights (with two flush) cards > > and three to a flush. > > > > It is interesting that some of the posters (including Mason) like calling > > it down with the big pair. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, Roy Cooke, 24. Aug 2002 13:35 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I stand by my decision on the hand! I think it is right. What is the name of the thread on 2+2? Roy Cooke on 23. Aug 2002 13:42 jim grass wrote: > Roy your article AA is getting quite the debate at 2+2..We have now also got > into the debate in our wednesday discussion group...I absolutely know your > decision was right and a very basic conclusion based on the wildness of the game > etc... > What I dont understand is why the response its getting... > We met once Roy at the bellagio during the poker meeting and hope someday to > see you face to face and discuss how our decisionmaking is going..I`m coming > down the week of sept 9-13 and am attending a barbecue the group is putting > together and you know your always welcomed .. > I think jan and Linda are busy that day sept 11th.. > > jim > | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, jim grass, 24. Aug 2002 17:33 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Go to the mid limit section ..."remarkable Roy Cook hand" dated aug 21st..Jim Breir started the thread... jg on 24. Aug 2002 13:35 Roy Cooke wrote: > I stand by my decision on the hand! I think it is right. > > What is the name of the thread on 2+2? > > Roy Cooke > > on 23. Aug 2002 13:42 jim grass wrote: > > Roy your article AA is getting quite the debate at 2+2..We have now also got > > into the debate in our wednesday discussion group...I absolutely know your > > decision was right and a very basic conclusion based on the wildness of the game > > > etc... > > What I dont understand is why the response its getting... > > We met once Roy at the bellagio during the poker meeting and hope someday to > > see you face to face and discuss how our decisionmaking is going..I`m coming > > down the week of sept 9-13 and am attending a barbecue the group is putting > > together and you know your always welcomed .. > > I think jan and Linda are busy that day sept 11th.. > > > > jim > > | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, catsclaw, 24. Aug 2002 18:19 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Roy, what were the results on the hand? on 24. Aug 2002 17:33 jim grass wrote: > Go to the mid limit section ..."remarkable Roy Cook hand" > dated aug 21st..Jim Breir started the thread... > > jg > > on 24. Aug 2002 13:35 Roy Cooke wrote: > > I stand by my decision on the hand! I think it is right. > > > > What is the name of the thread on 2+2? > > > > Roy Cooke > > > > on 23. Aug 2002 13:42 jim grass wrote: > > > Roy your article AA is getting quite the debate at 2+2..We have now also got > > > into the debate in our wednesday discussion group...I absolutely know your > > > decision was right and a very basic conclusion based on the wildness of the game > > > > > etc... > > > What I dont understand is why the response its getting... > > > We met once Roy at the bellagio during the poker meeting and hope someday to > > > see you face to face and discuss how our decisionmaking is going..I`m coming > > > down the week of sept 9-13 and am attending a barbecue the group is putting > > > together and you know your always welcomed .. > > > I think jan and Linda are busy that day sept 11th.. > > > > > > jim > > > | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, Roy Cooke, 25. Aug 2002 11:08 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| A fourth spade hit and the pot was won by a Queen of Spades! Roy Cooke on 24. Aug 2002 18:19 catsclaw wrote: > Roy, what were the results on the hand? > > on 24. Aug 2002 17:33 jim grass wrote: > > Go to the mid limit section ..."remarkable Roy Cook hand" > > dated aug 21st..Jim Breir started the thread... > > > > jg > > > > on 24. Aug 2002 13:35 Roy Cooke wrote: > > > I stand by my decision on the hand! I think it is right. > > > > > > What is the name of the thread on 2+2? > > > > > > Roy Cooke > > > > > > on 23. Aug 2002 13:42 jim grass wrote: > > > > Roy your article AA is getting quite the debate at 2+2..We have now also got > > > > into the debate in our wednesday discussion group...I absolutely know your > > > > decision was right and a very basic conclusion based on the wildness of the game > > > > > > > etc... > > > > What I dont understand is why the response its getting... > > > > We met once Roy at the bellagio during the poker meeting and hope someday to > > > > see you face to face and discuss how our decisionmaking is going..I`m coming > > > > down the week of sept 9-13 and am attending a barbecue the group is putting > > > > together and you know your always welcomed .. > > > > I think jan and Linda are busy that day sept 11th.. > > > > > > > > jim > > > > | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| Re: Roys cardplayer article, catsclaw, 25. Aug 2002 16:09 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| So you were good on the flop, but with soooo many ways to lose the pot, I still agree with your fold. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| POKER FORUM HOME | POKER FORUM | LINK TO US | ARCHIVE | ONLINE POKER | Copyright 2002, United Poker Forum |
|
Getting Started |
UPF Tournaments |
Poker News, Views, Rules |
Poker Strategy & Psychology |
Money and Bankroll Poker Bonuses & Promotions | World Series of Poker (WSOP) | Play Online Poker | Poker Odds & Statistics | Tournament Poker | Poker Books, Videos & Learning Tools Looking for a Poker Game | Poker Bad Beats | Not Quite Poker | Quizzes and Polls | Forum Suggestions & Bugs |
|
|
|
|
Interesting Links: Online Poker | Free Poker Games | United Poker Network |
|