![]() |
||
|
|
Server Time: 12/3/2008 9:27:52 PM PACIFIC |
Loose agressive games, Eric Bush, 31. Jul 2002 14:40 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| I play in Home games that are very loose/aggressive. Usually 5+ seeing the flop for at least one or two raises. After that they all seem to have pot odds to chase following the flop. Any suggestions on starting hands and how to compete with this group? I'm speaking of both Omaha 8 and HE, 10-20 limit. Thanks, Eric | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Loose agressive games, Roy Cooke, 31. Jul 2002 15:48 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| on 31. Jul 2002 14:40 Eric Bush wrote: > I play in Home games that are very loose/aggressive. Usually 5+ seeing the flop > for at least one or two raises. After that they all seem to have pot odds to > chase following the flop. Any suggestions on starting hands and how to compete > with this group? I'm speaking of both Omaha 8 and HE, 10-20 limit. > > Thanks, Eric Hi Eric In loose aggressive games with multiple raises before the flop you should tighten your hand selection a notch and play very tight. I also do not get into pre-flop raising wars with marginal raising hands because that just makes my oppponets after flop drawing hands that much richer in price. Also, hit the flop (or better yet hit the river...they can't draw out on you there! :-) Roy Cooke | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Loose agressive games, Eric Bush, 31. Jul 2002 16:04 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| Thanks Roy, I have been doing almost the exact opposite (which would account for my smaller bankroll) I've been reraising these guys because I'm fairly sure they have garbage pre flop. I've also been loosening up for the same reasons. Thanks again. I'll give it a try. Eric. | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Loose agressive games, docriver, 31. Jul 2002 19:05 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| but you can't tighten up too much that the rest of the guys notice. if they do, they won't like you, or they'll adjust and stop having fun. i once played in a seven stud hi/low declare game that was loads of fun. we never allowed 8 players because too often there wouldn't be enough cards to deal out all 7 cards. anyway, the game was so loose, so juicy, i was making $500 a night on it (it was only 3-6 limit). then i found out about the Ray Zee hi-low split game, and I realized that i was playing way too loose, so I tightened up and the first few nights i won even more, 1000+ in both nights. but i started to hear the grumblings, the mumblings, the suspicions, about how i was playing like a pro. the game soon ended, and then opened up again in another person's office, and i was never told, nor invited. when i asked about it, i was flat out told i was on the "blacklist". so, you see, my suggestion is not to get too tight to the point that you are no longer considered "one of the boys". the worst possible thing is getting kicked out of a juicy game for being too serious | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
Re: Loose agressive games, Roy Cooke, 1. Aug 2002 06:30 | ||
| View ( Message | Thread ) | Return to Thread List | |
| on 31. Jul 2002 19:05 docriver wrote: > but you can't tighten up too much that the rest of the guys notice. if they do, they won't > like you, or they'll adjust and stop having fun. i once played in a seven stud hi/low declare > game that was loads of fun. we never allowed 8 players because too often there wouldn't be > enough cards to deal out all 7 cards. anyway, the game was so loose, so juicy, i was making > $500 a night on it (it was only 3-6 limit). then i found out about the Ray Zee hi-low split > game, and I realized that i was playing way too loose, so I tightened up and the first few > nights i won even more, 1000+ in both nights. but i started to hear the grumblings, the > mumblings, the suspicions, about how i was playing like a pro. the game soon ended, and then > opened up again in another person's office, and i was never told, nor invited. when i asked > about it, i was flat out told i was on the "blacklist". so, you see, my suggestion is not to > get too tight to the point that you are no longer considered "one of the boys". the worst > possible thing is getting kicked out of a juicy game for being too serious I agree with this, and since I never get invited to private games my only perspective is in public casinos. A little fun in your personality will allieviate much of this. (not saying you are no fun Doc :-) Roy Cooke | ||
| Return to Thread List | ||
| POKER FORUM HOME | POKER FORUM | LINK TO US | ARCHIVE | ONLINE POKER | Copyright 2002, United Poker Forum |
|
Getting Started |
UPF Tournaments |
Poker News, Views, Rules |
Poker Strategy & Psychology |
Money and Bankroll Poker Bonuses & Promotions | World Series of Poker (WSOP) | Play Online Poker | Poker Odds & Statistics | Tournament Poker | Poker Books, Videos & Learning Tools Looking for a Poker Game | Poker Bad Beats | Not Quite Poker | Quizzes and Polls | Forum Suggestions & Bugs |
|
|
|
|
Interesting Links: Online Poker | Free Poker Games | United Poker Network |
|